Cancer researchers are striving to improve
the options
available to
patients; a point made clear by ideas presented at the 1998 American
Cancer
Society Science Writers Seminar. Among the experimental
strategies:
Chemotherapy Gel
In most cases, chemotherapy drugs circulate
throughout the
body, so
the doses that can be given safely are usually limited by side-effects.
For example, many chemotherapy drugs attack cells that are rapidly
dividing;
unfortunately, that means they often damage bone marrow cells, which,
like
cancer cells, grow rapidly.
The chemotherapy gel being worked on by Dr.
Harinder Garewal
and colleagues
at the Arizona Cancer Center is based on a simple desire: to
concentrate
the killing power of chemotherapy drugs on tumors, while sparing normal
tissues from their toxic onslaught. In the first phase of tests in
cancer
patients, researchers used a mixture of cisplatin and epinephrine,
proven
treatments for certain cancers. But in the gel experiment, doctors
managed
to increase the concentration of chemotherapy drug inside the tumor to
between 10 and 100 times the level of standard treatment. Despite that
intense concentration of drug attacking the cancer, the total dose used
was a small fraction of standard treatment: from 5 to 20 mg, compared
to
160 to 220 mg for standard chemotherapy; so the patient's normal
tissues
were subjected to very little of the toxic drug.
More importantly, researchers say the
tactic worked. In one
trial involving
82 patients with advanced metastatic cancers, 39 percent had complete
responses
to the treatment, while an additional 11 percent had partial responses.
"It should be emphasized that in such a... group of tumors, it is
unusual
to encounter even one or two responses," says Dr. Garewal. "The
response
in the lesions is durable. It won't come back." He adds that overall
the
treatment was well-tolerated.
However, Dr. Garewal emphasizes that while
the chemotherapy
gel can
destroy individual tumors, the patients with metastatic disease were
not
cured, because new tumors eventually appeared that could not be treated
with gel injections. In particular, the strategy may not work for brain
tumors, because it causes swelling which could be dangerous within the
confines of the skull.
"It's a very clever idea," says Frank
McCormick, PhD, director
of the
the University of California-San Francisco Cancer Center. He points out
that, even if it is not curative, the treatment could offer real
benefits
to patients with head and neck cancers by shrinking tumors that are
obstructing
their airways.
The gel is made from cow collagen, similar
to material used in
cosmetic
injections, but it has been re-engineered in order to produce some
special
properties. "It's based on collagen," says Dr. Garewal, "but the final
product is quite different. It took a lot of development work." The
most
important feature is the gel's response to body heat. While most
material
become softer at higher temperatures, this gel, which is a liquid at
room
temperature, solidifies at body temperature. That property means it can
be injected through a syringe directly into a tumor, where is hardens,
trapping the drug within the cancer growth. After the drug has done its
job, the collagen eventually dissolves.
The researchers are now pursuing a second
phase of trials to
test the
effectiveness of the gel. One group of patients has recurrent head and
neck cancer. A separate test is underway on patients with liver tumors.
In order to get objective results, neither the researchers nor the
patients
will know which patients are receiving gel injections containing active
chemotherapy and which are getting a placebo.
DNA Vaccines
A new type of vaccine could also offer a
way to use unique
features
of cancer cells to focus an attack. Dr. Hildegund Ertl of the Wistar
Institute
in Philadelphia is studying vaccines made from the genetic material,
the
DNA, of cancers. She is concentrating on a gene known as p53, which is
mutated in many types of cancer.
Dr. Ertl says the surfaces of many cancer
cells are covered
with abnormal
amounts of the protein produced by p53, while normal cell surfaces
exhibit
very little p53. The researchers attached the p53 gene to an altered
form
of a virus to make what is known as a "DNA vaccine." The idea is that
when
the vaccine is injected into the body, immune cells will recognize the
virus and the attached p53 gene as invaders and mount a counter-attack.
The hope is that the immune response would be concentrated on the
cancer
cells with high levels of p53 on their surfaces.
The technique has protected some laboratory
animals against
tumor cells.
A combination of the DNA vaccine with other substances that boost the
immune
system was able to shrink some established tumors in test
animals.
However, Dr. Ertl points out that the form
of the vaccine
tested so
far is not 100 effective, even in laboratory animals, so several years
of work remains before testing with people can even begin.
Enzyme Target
The American Cancer Society seminar also
heard of research at
the Oregon
Health Sciences University, where researchers are hoping to help some
leukemia
patients by exploiting a unique feature of their blood cancer
cells.
The target of this work is a protein
molecule called Bcr-Abl.
It is
an abnormal molecule related to enzymes that control cell growth. The
researchers
were attracted to Bcr-Abl because it appears only in chronic
myelogenous
leukemia, known as CML; normal cells don't have any Bcr-Abl.
The researchers developed a drug that would
block the Bcr-Abl
enzyme,
while not affecting any normal enzymes. "Our studies demonstrate that
this
compound kills cells that contain Bcr-Abl, but does not kill normal
cells,"
says Dr. Brian Druker of OHSU. Tests in patients with CML are scheduled
to begin this year at OHSU, the University of California at Los
Angeles,
and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas.
New CML treatments are urgently needed;
standard therapies
cure only
one patient in five. But the ultimate promise of this work is not
limited
to CML. Basic research is rapidly uncovering molecular abnormalities
that
are unique to other cancers. In each case, the researchers say, it may
be theoretically possible to identify targets for drugs that could kill
cancer cells, while leaving normal cells unaffected. However, they
stress
that this line of research has yet to prove itself in tests on
patients.
These three innovations in cancer
therapy may still be
a long
way from clinical use, but they represent just a few of the new ideas
being
tried in laboratories today, that someday may lead to more successful
treatment
of cancers.